The rating of the CSIRO total wellbeing diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 7.5/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 5.5/10”

REFERENCES

1. This diet gets a lower rating because it does not include alternate appropriate food sources for non-meat eaters, effectively excluding all vegetarians. While there is some small advice for vegetarians, it is left to the individual to seek professional advice from a qualified dietician to tailor the diet for them, which means it is not the same diet
2. Until the results of the Institutes of Health, four-year randomised, large scale clinical trial are completed in 2009 and the results are revealed, this diet cannot be endorsed yet as a diet that is safe in the long term as the potential health risks, safety and benefits of this diet have not been studied over a longer period

Popularity: 10% [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

The rating of the Sugar Busters! diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 7.5/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 5.5/10”

REFERENCES

1. This diet would get a higher rating if it had options for vegetarians. The rating is based on the Sugar Busters diet restricting a lot of unhealthy, empty calorie foods (sweets, junk, heavily processed foods) and permits many healthy, natural carbohydrates
2. Until the results of the Institutes of Health, four-year randomised, large scale clinical trial are completed in 2009 and the results are revealed, this diet cannot be endorsed yet as a diet that is safe in the long term as the potential health risks, safety and benefits of this diet have not been studied over a longer period

Popularity: unranked [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

The rating of the South Beach diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 8.0/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 7.0/10”

REFERENCES

1. The South Beach diet is recommended by many doctors and nutritionists, now that dairy and fruit have been introduced into the strict phase one, which means that there is less likelihood of missing out on important and vital nutrients, plus the fact that this diet centres around unsaturated fats and low GI carbohydrates, does not count calories or portion size and the maintenance phase allows dieters to basically eat whatever they want (within reason – no white, processed foods, which are full of empty calories anyway) this diet is recommended in the short term as a possibly healthy diet
2. Until the results of the Institutes of Health, four-year randomised, large scale clinical trial are completed in 2009 and the results are revealed, this diet cannot be endorsed yet as a diet that is safe in the long term as the potential health risks, safety and benefits of this diet have not been studied over a longer period. The South Beach diet does have many benefits (see point 1 above)

Popularity: 3% [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

The rating of the Pritikin principle diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 9.5/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 7.5/10”

REFERENCES

1. The Pritikin diet is an excellent diet for the short term. It ensures that there is a high intake of fruits, vegetables, grains and restricts or bans all processed foods. This diet adheres to almost all of the principles of healthy eating recommended by nutritionists all around the world and it is suitable for vegetarians.
2. While the Pritikin diet is entirely suitable for the short term, it needs more fat in the diet to make it a perfect diet, as it’s current recommendation of only 10% daily fat intake may be insufficient for absorbing the fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) which could cause some deficiencies and potentially health problems

Popularity: -0% [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

The rating of the Perricone diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 6.5/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 4.5/10”

REFERENCES

1. If this diet was for non-vegetarians only, it would get a higher score, but because this diet is mainly aimed at people who eat animal and fish flesh, it means it is not really relevant for vegetarians and cannot be rated as highly.
2. Until the results of the Institutes of Health, four-year randomised, large scale clinical trial are completed in 2009 and the results are revealed, this diet cannot be endorsed yet as a diet that is safe in the long term as the potential health risks, safety and benefits of this diet have not been studied over a longer period

Popularity: unranked [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

The rating of the Mediterranean diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 9/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 9/10”

REFERENCES

1. The the Lyon Diet Heart study which was a randomised, controlled trial with over 600 people who had all survived a heart attack. About half of the subjects (302) were put on a Mediterranean-type diet and the other half of the subject, the control group (303) were given no dietary advice from the researchers but were asked by their doctors to follow a heart-smart diet. The results of this study (after 46 months, about 4 years) showed that the people on the Mediterranean-type diet had a 50–70 percent lower risk of recurrent heart disease (heart attack, stroke and death) than the control group. The Lyon Diet Heart study showed that even those people eating as per the mediterannean-type had high blood lipid levels, they still had much lower risk of heart disease than the control group

Popularity: 2% [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

The rating of the Macrobiotic diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 7/10”*

“Rating as a long term diet – 7/10”*

REFERENCES

1. If carefully planned, this is a good diet, as long as there are enough fruits, vegetables, grains, cereals, pulses and essential fatty acids in the diet and it is not one of the more restrictive forms of the macrobiotic diet
2. If carefully planned, this is can be a really good diet, as long as there are enough fruits, vegetables, grains, cereals, pulses and essential fatty acids in the diet, the diet is not strict on intake and it is not one of the more restrictive forms of the macrobiotic diet. The American National Institutes of Health, Office of Alternative Medicine has funded a pilot study to determine if a macrobiotic diet may prevent cancer. This study has been completed (June 2008) but the results of the study are not yet available

Popularity: 1% [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

The rating of the low GI diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 9.0/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 6.5/10”

REFERENCES

1. This diet is favoured by many nutrition experts as a generally good diet that focuses on the intake of lots of fresh fruit and vegetables, wholegrains and low fat protein sources and it can be used by vegetarians
2. There are no long-term studies on the low GI diet or of the impact of GI on the total meal (not just its components, which have been studied) and while this diet adheres to most of the recommendation of nutrition experts today, this diet should be considered a “work in progress” that is not yet at it’s final point

Popularity: 5% [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

The rating of the juicing-fasting diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 2/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 0/10”

REFERENCES

1. Cabot S. The Juice Fasting Bible. Ulysses Press, USA 2007

Popularity: 2% [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

The rating of the CSIRO total wellbeing diet is on two levels and is based on the clinical evidence so far received for this diet from all the clinical studies so far conducted:

“Rating as a short term diet – 7.5/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 5.5/10”

REFERENCES

1. This diet gets a lower rating because it does not include alternate appropriate food sources for non-meat eaters, effectively excluding all vegetarians. While there is some small advice for vegetarians, it is left to the individual to seek professional advice from a qualified dietician to tailor the diet for them, which means it is not the same diet
2. Until the results of the Institutes of Health, four-year randomised, large scale clinical trial are completed in 2009 and the results are revealed, this diet cannot be endorsed yet as a diet that is safe in the long term as the potential health risks, safety and benefits of this diet have not been studied over a longer period

Popularity: 10% [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating

“Rating as a short term diet – 8.5/10”

“Rating as a long term diet – 3.5/10”

REFERENCES

1. There have been several studies that have shown the significant health benefits of this diet over the short term (clinical trials have been conducted for up to one year)
2. Until the results of the Institutes of Health, four-year randomised, large scale clinical trial are completed in 2009 and the results are revealed, this diet cannot be endorsed yet as a diet that is safe in the long term as the potential health risks, safety and benefits of this diet have not been studied over a longer period

Popularity: 2% [?]

Be Sociable, Share!

• 

Related posts:

1. Diet Rating
2. Diet Rating
3. Diet Rating
4. Diet Rating
5. Diet Rating